Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 98 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 2% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G3930 - 143 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600X - £49.99 vs £178.58
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £178.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76510 minutes ago
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76508 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
54.140694568121106%
Multi-Core
1043
21.884179605539238%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |