Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 1190 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £99.97 vs £2378.05
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen 5 1600X - 167 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 64 vs 12 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 333 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
167
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£2378.05
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for £2,378.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 333 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1123
67.85498489425981%
Multi-Core
4766
32.69085671170862%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |