Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 152 days newer than Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 5 1600 - 135 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 24 vs 12 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
132
97.77777777777777%
Value, £/FPS
£1.82/FPS
100%
Price, £
£240.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £240.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1068
78.2991202346041%
Multi-Core
4578
50.29663810151616%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |