Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1443 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 4% better in Fortnite than FX-6350 - 221 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - £39.99 vs £240.28
- Up to 83% better value when playing Fortnite than Ryzen 5 1600 - £0.19 vs £1.09 per FPS
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
221
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.09/FPS
17.431192660550458%
Price, £
£240.28
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for £240.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
213
96.38009049773756%
Value, £/FPS
£0.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |