Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is 1512 days newer than Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i7-6900K - 234 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 16 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Core i7-6900K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Not Available | Codename | Broadwell-E |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
