Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is 1785 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Performs up to 11% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G3900 - 176 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 51 vs 65 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
40.0137741046832%
Multi-Core
992
21.246519597344186%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Not Available | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
