Buy on Amazon
£5.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is 2787 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Performs up to 78% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G1610 - 164 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 55 vs 65 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
BQTEC Intel Celeron G1610 2.60 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 2 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processor LGA 1155
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75530 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
29.338842975206614%
Multi-Core
739
15.827800385521526%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Not Available | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
