Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is 2828 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-8350 - 175 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
| Not Available | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
