Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 288 days newer than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - 112 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - 32 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Single-Core
1102
65.75178997613365%
Multi-Core
3078
24.917024204646644%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Not Available | Codename | Castle Peak |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
