Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is 2533 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than FX-8320 - 174 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
| Not Available | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
