Buy on Amazon
£225
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $120
Availability
MSRP in USD: $120
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2790 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-3330 - 171 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3330 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - £59.99 vs £225.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X Processor (4C/8T, 18 MB Cache, 4.3 GHz Max Boost)
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76891 minutes ago
Intel i5-3330 Ivybridge Box Core i5 Processor (3GHz, 6MB Cache, Socket LGA 1155)
Buy for £59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76891 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Ryzen 3 3300X
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Core i5-3330
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3330
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
555
33.23353293413174%
Multi-Core
1643
28.36181598480925%
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Matisse | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
