Key Differences
In short — Xeon w7-2495X outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon w7-2495X is 1136 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w7-2495X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon w7-2495X
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 3 3250U - 160 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 48 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 3250U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Xeon w7-2495X
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Xeon w7-2495X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 15th, 2023 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon W |
| Picasso | Codename | Sapphire Rapids |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 4677 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 48 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 15 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
