Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 363 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Sea of Thieves than Ryzen 3 3250U - 245 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 16 vs 4 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
245
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.34/FPS
100%
Price, £
£328.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £328.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |