Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7960X outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7960X is 857 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than Intel Core i9-7960X - 15 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7960X
- Performs up to 7% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 3 3250U - 131 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 32 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 3250U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Core i9-7960X
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i9-7960X |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
