Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1102 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 15 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 15% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Ryzen 3 3250U - 189 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 32 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for £579.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65532 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Single-Core
748
24.090177133655395%
Multi-Core
1447
6.627582100490084%
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |