Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3250U outperforms Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3250U is 3284 days newer than Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Performs up to 5% better in HITMAN 2 than Core i7-2600S - 121 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600S - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 8 vs 4 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |