Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3250U outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3250U is 1098 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 23 than Celeron G3930 - 170 vs 159 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 15 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65755 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
81.28342245989305%
Multi-Core
1043
72.08016586040083%
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |