Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 483 days older than Ryzen 3 3200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 88% better in League of Legends than Ryzen 3 3200U - 165 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200U - 24 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |