Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 480 days newer than Ryzen 3 3200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 12% better in World of Warcraft than Ryzen 3 3200U - 184 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200U - 12 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
184
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.22/FPS
100%
Price, £
£224.84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £224.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |