Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 635 days older than Ryzen 3 3200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 5% better in Sea of Thieves than Ryzen 3 3200U - 225 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200U - 12 vs 4 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Ryzen 3 3200U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Picasso | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
