Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 298 days newer than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 281 vs 268 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 20 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
60.148656375071475%
Multi-Core
3013
32.88224380661355%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
