Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4690 is 1893 days older than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 65 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 6% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 335 vs 316 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £44.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77958 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
88.32913518052057%
Multi-Core
3013
91.22010293672419%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |