Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 141 days newer than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 8% better in Remnant II than Ryzen 3 3200G - 91 vs 84 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 48 vs 4 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
91
100%
Value, £/FPS
£13.74/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1250
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |