Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 366 days newer than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 161 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 24 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £470 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75668 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
60.84441873915558%
Multi-Core
3013
30.03988035892323%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Picasso | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |