Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2260 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-4350 - 237 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Picasso | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |