Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 1938 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 57% better in Diablo IV than FX-6300 - 149 vs 95 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 6 vs 4 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
