Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Ryzen 3 1300X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 1083 days newer than Ryzen 3 1300X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 3 1300X - 424 vs 400 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 128 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
424
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£5695
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for £5,695 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Single-Core
1097
68.64831038798498%
Multi-Core
3157
21.290801186943618%
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 64 |
4 | Threads | 128 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |