Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 205 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 26% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G3930 - 131 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - £49.99 vs £175.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Ryzen 3 1200 - £0.48 vs £1.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6589 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
104
79%
Value, £/FPS
£0.48/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6588 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |