Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 1738 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-4300 - 198 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - £24.62 vs £175.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 3 1200 - £0.13 vs £0.88 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
Buy for £24.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |