Key Differences
In short — Pentium G630 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G630 is 1256 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Performs up to 2% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Phenom X4 9650 - 174 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Pentium G630 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Pentium |
Agena | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |