Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 3658 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 81% better in The Callisto Protocol than Phenom X4 9650 - 112 vs 62 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
112
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.42/FPS
100%
Price, £
£271.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £271.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1635 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
18.00302571860817%
Multi-Core
765
16.307823491792796%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Agena | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |