Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 3939 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Phenom X4 9650 - 135 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 6 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
135
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£168.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £168.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Agena | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |