Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9500T outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9500T is 3657 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500T
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Phenom X4 9650 - 150 vs 143 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 6 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Core i5-9500T
Desktop • Apr 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i5-9500T |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2018 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Agena | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
