Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670S outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670S is 1893 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Phenom X4 9650 - 127 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Core i5-4670S
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
20.677671589921808%
Multi-Core
765
23.509526736324524%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Agena | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
