Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 5031 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Tanks than Phenom X4 9650 - 540 vs 498 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
540
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.11/FPS
100%
Price, £
£58.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £58.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1696 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
14.847161572052403%
Multi-Core
765
28.375370919881306%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
Agena | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |