Key Differences
In short — Celeron G550 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G550 is 1527 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Phenom X4 9650 - 149 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Agena | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
