Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 3659 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 4% better in Escape From Tarkov than Phenom X4 9650 - 192 vs 184 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 54 vs 95 Watts
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
192
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.31/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1696 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
38.63636363636363%
Multi-Core
765
72.78782112274025%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
Agena | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |