Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 4119 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 32% better in War Thunder than Phenom X4 9650 - 160 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
22.623574144486692%
Multi-Core
765
25.389976767341523%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Agena | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
