Buy on Amazon
£59.97
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 1859 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Phenom X4 9650 - 145 vs 143 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
145
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FX-4350 4-Core Processor (125W, AM3+, 12MB Cache, 4300MHz)
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1683 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
50.74626865671642%
Multi-Core
765
62.911184210526315%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | FX |
| Agena | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
