Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 1494 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Phenom X4 9550 - 113 vs 108 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
34.873323397913566%
Multi-Core
712
30.969986950848195%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Agena | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
