Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 4621 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 27% better in Battlefield IV than Phenom II X4 925 - 461 vs 364 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 20 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £246.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
13.547840812870449%
Multi-Core
930
8.06801422746595%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Deneb | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |