Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 4327 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 30% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Phenom II X4 925 - 192 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 16 vs 4 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Core i7-11700F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
15.230842455973345%
Multi-Core
930
10.580204778156997%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Deneb | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
