Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 4508 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 28% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Phenom II X4 830 - 212 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
212
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£291.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £291.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2031 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Deneb | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |