Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 4774 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 34% better in No Man's Sky than Phenom II X4 830 - 207 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 20 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom II X4 830
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Core i5-13600KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Deneb | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
