Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2191 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Phenom II X4 830 - 177 vs 174 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
177
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.11/FPS
100%
Price, £
£19.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2868 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Celeron |
Deneb | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |