Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 4651 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 22% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Phenom II X4 810 - 186 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 24 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
186
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.63/FPS
100%
Price, £
£302.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £302.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Deneb | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |