Buy on Amazon
£141
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 884 days newer than Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-2400S - 118 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
AMD FX-9590 Vishera 8-Core 4.7 GHz Socket AM3+ 220W FD9590FHHKWOF Desktop Processor - Black
Buy for £141 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
91.17647058823529%
Multi-Core
1352
62.27544910179641%
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
|---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 220 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 23.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
