Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2358 days newer than FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 220 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 15% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-9590 - 194 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 48 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £1,455 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |