Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

FX-8370 vs Celeron G3900

FX-8370 vs Celeron G3900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 364 days newer than FX-8370.

Advantages of AMD FX-8370

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads

Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900

  • Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-8370 - 459 vs 449 FPS
  • Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 51 vs 125 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege.
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD FX-8370 Logo
FX-8370

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014


FPS

449

97.82135076252723%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


FPS

459

100%

Value, £/FPS

£0.28/FPS

100%

Price, £

£128.82

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Celeron G3900 Dual-Core Processor (2 Core, 2.80 GHz)

Buy for £128.82 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 1616 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD FX-8370 Logo
FX-8370

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD FX-8370 Logo
FX-8370

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014


Single-Core

501

86.23063683304647%

Multi-Core

2042

100%

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


Single-Core

581

100%

Multi-Core

992

48.579823702252696%

AMD FX-8370

vs

Intel Celeron G3900

Sep 2nd, 2014Release Date
Sep 1st, 2015
FXCollectionCeleron
VisheraCodenameSkylake
AMD Socket AM3+SocketIntel Socket 1151
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
8
Cores2
8
Threads2
4.0 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.8 GHz
4.3 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
125 WTDP
51 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
20.0xMultiplier
28.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
Intel HD 510
Yes
OverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.