Buy on Amazon
£321.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $409
Availability
MSRP in USD: $409
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2947 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 19% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than FX-8320E - 246 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-13700K Desktop Processor 16 cores (8 P-cores + 8 E-cores) 30M Cache, up to 5.4 GHz
Buy for £321.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76714 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i7-13700K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using FX-8320E or Core i7-13700K
Mass Effect: Andromeda, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
223 FPS
£8.65/FPS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Core i7-13700K
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
£1,930.02
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
